BlackBerry UEM vs Microsoft Endpoint Manager
March 15, 2025 | Author: Michael Stromann
4★
Enable secure productivity across an increasingly remote digital workplace with unified endpoint management (UEM) and policy control. Organizations are addressing new use cases to maintain and improve their security posture.
11★
Get endpoint security, device management, and intelligent cloud actions in a unified management platform with Microsoft Intune and Configuration Manager.
BlackBerry UEM and Microsoft Endpoint Manager, despite their dramatically different names, both attempt to wrangle the same chaotic digital ecosystem. They let IT administrators pretend they have control over mobile devices, desktops and applications, enforcing policies with all the enthusiasm of a bouncer at an intergalactic nightclub. Both solutions integrate with identity and access management, ensuring that people only get access to things they’re actually allowed to see—because, after all, no one wants Dave from accounting accidentally launching a nuclear reactor app on his phone. Naturally, they also cater to the grand corporate fantasy of managing both company-owned and employee-owned devices without anyone getting too rebellious.
BlackBerry UEM, forged in the frosty depths of Canada sometime around 2011, comes with a particular obsession for security—because when you’ve built phones for governments and secret agents, you can’t just let things slide. It thrives in high-stakes environments where cybersecurity means more than just remembering not to write your password on a sticky note. With its legendary containerization technology, it keeps corporate apps sealed tighter than an airlock in deep space. Unlike some competitors who have gone full-cloud, BlackBerry still likes the idea of on-premises deployment, just in case someone out there is still clinging to a server like a life raft.
Meanwhile, Microsoft Endpoint Manager hails from the United States and is the inevitable byproduct of Microsoft’s long and storied relationship with IT departments worldwide. It grew out of Microsoft Intune (2011) and SCCM (which, legend has it, has been around since before recorded history in 1994). This tool is deeply embedded in the Windows-centric universe, ensuring that every laptop, tablet and phone under its reign obeys the almighty rules of Azure AD. Unlike BlackBerry, it embraces the modern cloud with all the enthusiasm of a corporate exec trying to make "hybrid work" sound like a great idea. It also juggles co-management with SCCM, meaning that for many IT teams, it’s not about choosing between the old and the new—it’s about keeping both running just long enough to avoid an intergalactic meltdown.
See also: Top 10 MDM software
BlackBerry UEM, forged in the frosty depths of Canada sometime around 2011, comes with a particular obsession for security—because when you’ve built phones for governments and secret agents, you can’t just let things slide. It thrives in high-stakes environments where cybersecurity means more than just remembering not to write your password on a sticky note. With its legendary containerization technology, it keeps corporate apps sealed tighter than an airlock in deep space. Unlike some competitors who have gone full-cloud, BlackBerry still likes the idea of on-premises deployment, just in case someone out there is still clinging to a server like a life raft.
Meanwhile, Microsoft Endpoint Manager hails from the United States and is the inevitable byproduct of Microsoft’s long and storied relationship with IT departments worldwide. It grew out of Microsoft Intune (2011) and SCCM (which, legend has it, has been around since before recorded history in 1994). This tool is deeply embedded in the Windows-centric universe, ensuring that every laptop, tablet and phone under its reign obeys the almighty rules of Azure AD. Unlike BlackBerry, it embraces the modern cloud with all the enthusiasm of a corporate exec trying to make "hybrid work" sound like a great idea. It also juggles co-management with SCCM, meaning that for many IT teams, it’s not about choosing between the old and the new—it’s about keeping both running just long enough to avoid an intergalactic meltdown.
See also: Top 10 MDM software